The Socrates Express
- Автор: Вейнер Эрик
- Год: 2020
- Язык: английский
- Год: Avid Reader Press / Simon & Schuster
- Жанр: География, путевые заметки
Электронная книга - «The Socrates Express». Краткое содержание книги:
We contemplate for the same reasons we travel: to see the world from a different perspective, to unearth hidden beauty and find new ways of being. We want to learn how to embrace wonder. Face regrets. Sustain hope.
Eric Weiner, *New York Times* bestselling author of *The Geography of Bliss* , combines his twin passions for philosophy and global travel in a pilgrimage that uncovers surprising life lessons from philosophers around the world, from Marcus Aurelius to Arthur Schopenhauer, Confucius to Montaigne. Traveling by train (the most thoughtful mode of transport) he traversed thousands of miles, making stops in Athens, Delhi,...
It’s a truism that men make lousy patients. It is a truism that happens to be true. I am a big baby when I’m sick. Montaigne was, too. Unlike me, he suffered from an actual illness: painful kidney stones that tormented him for much of his adult life. Montaigne cursed “the stone,” which had killed his father and now threatened to take him, too.
Illness is nature’s way of preparing us for death, easing us into it. Just as a tooth falls out, painlessly, so, too, do we slip away from ourselves. To go from healthy to dead is too much for us to bear, but “the leap is not so cruel from a painful life to no life,” he says.
Montaigne is suggesting a radically different version of the “good death.” We consider a good death one that follows a brief illness, or no illness at all. No, says Montaigne. Too big a leap. Better to slip away gradually than fall suddenly.
On the one hand, Montaigne’s slippage theory makes sense. Better a small fall than a large one. But try telling that to someone in mid-fall. For the past few years, I’ve watched my mother-in-law fall, as Parkinson’s disease steals her, piece by piece. First, it took her steady gait, then her ability to walk at all. Not satisfied with this plunder, it went after her mind, robbing her of the ability to read a book or conduct a conversation. When her final fall comes, yes, it will be a small one, but only because she’s been plummeting for a long time now. Illness may be nature’s way of preparing us for death but, as I know from public speaking, it’s possible to overprepare. Sometimes we’re better off blustering into a situation, ignorant of the risks. And sometimes a big fall is better than a small one.
Like Montaigne, I, too, am starting to slip away from myself. My hair slipped away several decades ago, along with my washboard abs and unblemished skin. As far as I’m concerned, that’s enough slippage. Can we stop now? I don’t want to die, nature be damned. I could get used to immortality. Or could I?
Simone de Beauvoir plays with that question in her novel All Men Are Mortal. The protagonist is an Italian nobleman named Raymond Fosca. He is immortal, thanks to a potion he drank back in the fourteenth century. At first he considers immortality an incredible blessing, and strives to put it to good use. He wants to improve the lives of his people. Yet he comes to view his immortality as a curse. Everyone he loves dies. He is bored. (Even his dreams are boring.) He lacks generosity since, as an immortal, he has nothing to sacrifice. His life lacks urgency, and vitality. We may fear death, but the alternative, immortality, is far worse.
An awareness of death enables us to live more fully. The ancient Egyptians knew this. In the midst of feasts, they carted in skeletons to remind guests of their fate. The ancient Greeks and Romans knew this. “Persuade yourself that each new day that dawns will be your last,” says the poet Horace, “then you will receive each unexpected hour with gratitude.”
Montaigne died in his chateau on September 13, 1592, at age fifty-nine. He was not old. The cause of death was quinsy, a painful abscess in the throat caused by an infected tonsil. In his final days, he was unable to speak, an especially cruel affliction for a man who considered conversation “sweeter than any other action in life.”
In his final hours, he summoned his household staff and paid them their inheritance. A friend reports that he “tasted and took death with sweetness.” We don’t know much more. Was that sweetness of the “infinite” variety he reported after his riding accident—or something else? Did Montaigne, in the end, feel cheated of a few more years?
Driving our dread of death is not only fear but greed. We want more days, more years, and when, against all odds, we receive those, we want more still. Why? wondered Montaigne. If you have lived one day, you have lived them all. “There is no other light, no other night. This sun, this moon, these stars, the way they are arranged, all of these are the very same your ancestors enjoyed and will entertain your grandchildren.” When my time comes, I hope I can hold on to Montaigne’s words.
No, chides Michel. Not my words. Yours. There is no such thing as an impersonal insight. Borrowed truths fit about as well as borrowed underwear, and are just as icky. You either know something in your heart or you don’t know it at all. Live your life not as a standardized exam but, like Gandhi, as one grand experiment. In this sort of personal, lived philosophy, the goal is not abstract knowledge but personal truths: not to know that but simply to know. There’s an enormous difference. I know that love is an important human emotion and has many health benefits. I know I love my daughter.
Montaigne’s philosophy boils down to this: Trust yourself. Trust your experiences. Trust your doubts, too. Let them guide you through life, and to the threshold of death. Cultivate the capacity to be surprised, by others and by yourself. Tickle yourself. Remain open to the possibility of possibility. And, for God’s sake, says Montaigne, joining hands with his compatriot Simone Weil, pay attention.
When I return to the hotel after a visit to Montaigne’s tower, I grab a notebook and pen and assay to describe what I have seen. I draw a blank. Nothing. I wasn’t paying attention. “Damn it,” I say aloud.
“Give me a piece of paper,” a voice replies.
Who said that? The voice is coming from the far side of the room. It sounds familiar.
“Sonya?”
“Give me a piece of paper, Dad.”
She has roused from hibernation. I hand her a piece of paper and a pencil. She begins to write, to draw. After five minutes, she hands me the paper.
I’m floored. She has drawn a remarkably accurate rendering of Montaigne’s tower, in great detail and complete with labels such as “Window Number Two” and “Old Horse Saddle Number Three.” I had assumed the tour of Montaigne’s tower bored her and that she had mentally checked out. Not for the first, or last, time I remind myself to always question assumptions.
A few days later, Sonya hands me another piece of paper: translations of the sayings carved into the rafters of Montaigne’s tower. Glancing at the paper, one short quotation stands out. From the Greek philosopher Sextus Empiricus: “It is possible and it is not possible.”
I stare at the quote for a long time. It’s one of those philosophical riddles that are either extremely wise or extremely absurd. Possibly both. I decide to try it out, assay it, Montaigne-style. Old Man pen in hand, I write in my Old Man notebook:
It is not possible for a 16th-century flatulent Frenchman with itchy ears to teach us anything. It is possible.
It is not possible to travel to France with a moody thirteen-year-old and maintain your sanity—even learn a thing or two about life, and death. It is possible.
It is not possible to face death—and, yes, life—fearlessly and intimately. It is possible.
At least I think it is. What do I know?
EPILOGUE
Arrival
5:42 p.m. On board Metrorail’s Red Line, en route from Washington, D.C.’s Union Station to Silver Spring, Maryland. Heading home.
Familiarity doesn’t breed contempt. It breeds numbness. We fail to see the beauty of the proximate, or hear the music of home.
It’s tempting to blame our surroundings. I do. Metrorail isn’t Swiss nice. No views of the Alps, or much else, either. Only the sweaty back of the commuter standing too close. I’m surrounded by Schopenhauer’s porcupines, needles extended, approaching and retreating, approaching and retreating.
Yet, if my journey has taught me anything, it is that perception is a choice. The world is my idea. Why not make it a good idea?