The Socrates Express
- Автор: Вейнер Эрик
- Год: 2020
- Язык: английский
- Год: Avid Reader Press / Simon & Schuster
- Жанр: География, путевые заметки
Электронная книга - «The Socrates Express». Краткое содержание книги:
We contemplate for the same reasons we travel: to see the world from a different perspective, to unearth hidden beauty and find new ways of being. We want to learn how to embrace wonder. Face regrets. Sustain hope.
Eric Weiner, *New York Times* bestselling author of *The Geography of Bliss* , combines his twin passions for philosophy and global travel in a pilgrimage that uncovers surprising life lessons from philosophers around the world, from Marcus Aurelius to Arthur Schopenhauer, Confucius to Montaigne. Traveling by train (the most thoughtful mode of transport) he traversed thousands of miles, making stops in Athens, Delhi,...
Philosophy may be the art of asking questions, but what is a question? Ah, now there’s a question Socrates would love! Take a word everyone knows, everyone thinks they know, and examine it, probe it, poke it from many angles. Shine a bright and unforgiving light on it.
Some twenty-four centuries have elapsed since the barefoot philosopher of Athens roamed the city’s winding, dirty streets and asked questions. We’ve made much progress since then: indoor plumbing, almond milk, broadband. We’ve had more than two thousand years to hone our definitions. We’re pretty good at it, too, judging by the nearly half a million entries in Webster’s Third New International Dictionary. We needn’t dirty our fingers with pages, print or even digital. We can always turn to our faithful aide-de-camp: Siri.
“Hello, Siri.”
“Hey, Eric.”
“I have a question.”
“Ask and you shall receive.”
“What is a question?”
“Interesting question, Eric.”
Then silence. Nothing. I shake my phone. Still nothing. Siri clearly thinks I’m yanking her algorithm, and she’s having none of it. I try a more literal approach.
“Siri: What is the definition of a question?”
“A sentence worded or expressed to elicit information.”
That is accurate, I suppose, but woefully incomplete. Socrates wouldn’t be satisfied. He was a stickler for definitions. He’d find Siri’s answer at once too broad and too narrow. According to Siri’s definition, both the question Have you seen my keys? and What is the meaning of life? exist on an equal plane. Both aim to elicit information, of a sort—and both are difficult to answer, at least in my house—but the information they seek differs so widely as to be of a different kind. The bigger the question, the less interested we are in a reply that provides merely information. What is love? Why does evil exist? When we ask these questions, it is not information we desire but something larger: meaning.
Questions aren’t one-way; they move in (at least) two directions. They seek meaning, and convey it, too. Asking a friend the right question at the right time is an act of compassion, of love. Too often, though, we deploy questions as weapons, firing them at others—Who do you think you are? and at ourselves, Why can’t I do anything right? We use questions as excuses—What difference will it make? and, later, as justification, What more could I have done? Questions, not the eyes, are the true windows to the soul. As Voltaire said, the best judge of a person is not the answers they give but the questions they ask.
Siri’s response captured none of the magic embedded in every good question, the kind Socrates had in mind when he said, “All philosophy begins with wonder.” Wonder, Socrates thought, isn’t something you’re either born with or not, like blond hair or freckles. Wonder is a skill, one we’re all capable of learning. He was determined to show us how.
“Wonder” is a wonderful word. It’s impossible to say it aloud without smiling. It comes from the Old English wundor, meaning “marvelous thing, miracle, object of astonishment.” On one level, to wonder is to seek information, in Siri fashion. I wonder where I can find some dark chocolate? On another level, to wonder is to suspend inquiry, at least momentarily, and simply behold. I wonder what it is about good Belgian chocolate, spiked with sea salt and almonds, that makes my brain dance and my heart sing?
When we question, we are constrained by the topic at hand. Any queries that extend beyond that topic are deemed superfluous and therefore discouraged. Think of a lawyer chided by the judge for veering into “immaterial” lines of questioning, or a high school student reprimanded by her teacher for straying “off topic.”
Wondering is open-ended, expansive. Wondering is what makes us human. That’s been true ever since the first caveman wondered what would happen if he rubbed two sticks together, or dropped a large rock on his head. You never know until you try and you never try until you wonder.
We often conflate wonder with curiosity. Yes, both provide helpful antidotes to apathy, but in different ways. Wonder is personal in a way curiosity is not. You can be curious dispassionately. You can question dispassionately. You cannot wonder dispassionately. Curiosity is restive, always threatening to chase the next shiny object that pops into view. Not wonder. Wonder lingers. Wonder is curiosity reclined, feet up, drink in hand. Wonder never chased a shiny object. Wonder never killed a cat.
Wonder takes time. Like a good meal or good sex, it can’t be rushed. That’s why Socrates never hurried his conversations. He persevered even when his conversers grew weary and exasperated.
Socrates was the original therapist. He tended to answer a question with another question. Unlike a therapist, Socrates did not bill by the hour (he never charged a single drachma for his sessions) and never uttered the words “I’m afraid that’s all the time we have.” He always had more time.
Even when alone, Socrates liked to linger, a friend reports in the Symposium. “He sometimes stops and stands wherever he happens to be.” Another friend recounts an even more unusual episode that occurred when both men served together during the battle of Potidaea.
One time at dawn he [Socrates] began to think something over and stood in the same spot considering it, and when he found no solution, he didn’t leave but stood there inquiring. It got to be midday, and people became aware of it, wondering at it among themselves, saying Socrates had stood there since dawn thinking about something. Finally some of the Ionians, when evening came, carried their bedding out to sleep in the cool air and to watch to see if he’d also stand there all night. He stood until dawn came and the sun rose; then he offered a prayer to the sun, and left.
Good philosophy is slow philosophy. Ludwig Wittgenstein called his profession the “slow cure” and suggested all philosophers greet one another with “Take your time!” I think that’s a fine idea, not only for philosophers but all of us. Rather than “Have a good day” or similarly empty expressions, let’s greet each other with “Take your time” or “Slow down.” Utter these imperatives often enough, and we might actually decelerate.
On some level, I think, we already recognize the cognitive benefits of slowing down. When something makes us stop and think, we say it “gives us pause.” A pause is not a mistake or a glitch. A pause is not a stutter or an interruption. It is not emptiness but a kind of latent matter. The seed of thought. Every pause is ripe with the possibility of cognition, and of wonder.
We rarely question the obvious. Socrates thought this oversight was a mistake. The more obvious something seems, the more urgent the need to question it.
I take it as a given that I want to be a good father. It is so self-evident it hardly requires stating.
Not so fast, Socrates would say. What do you mean by “father”? Are you speaking in strictly biological terms?
“Well, no. Actually, my daughter is adopted.”
Ah, so a “father” is something more than biological?
“Yes, absolutely.”
What defines a father, then?
“Someone, a male, who cares for a young child.”
So if I take your daughter to, say, Delphi for a few hours am I her father?
“No, of course not, Socrates. Being a father entails a lot more than that.”
What is it then, that separates a male adult who cares for a child from a male adult worthy of the title “father”?
“Love. That is what makes a father a father.”
Very good. I like that answer. Of course, we need to define “love,” but we’ll save that for another time. Now, you say you want to be a “good” father?