The Socrates Express
- Автор: Вейнер Эрик
- Год: 2020
- Язык: английский
- Год: Avid Reader Press / Simon & Schuster
- Жанр: География, путевые заметки
Электронная книга - «The Socrates Express». Краткое содержание книги:
We contemplate for the same reasons we travel: to see the world from a different perspective, to unearth hidden beauty and find new ways of being. We want to learn how to embrace wonder. Face regrets. Sustain hope.
Eric Weiner, *New York Times* bestselling author of *The Geography of Bliss* , combines his twin passions for philosophy and global travel in a pilgrimage that uncovers surprising life lessons from philosophers around the world, from Marcus Aurelius to Arthur Schopenhauer, Confucius to Montaigne. Traveling by train (the most thoughtful mode of transport) he traversed thousands of miles, making stops in Athens, Delhi,...
There’s a scene in the movie Lawrence of Arabia where Lawrence, played by Peter O’Toole, calmly extinguishes a match between his thumb and forefinger.
A fellow officer tries it himself, and squeals in pain. “Ouch, it damn well hurts,” he says.
“Certainly it hurts,” replies Lawrence.
“Well, what’s the trick, then?”
“The trick,” says Lawrence, “is not minding that it hurts.”
Lawrence’s response was Stoic. Sure, he felt the pain, yet it remained a raw sensory sensation, a reflex. It never metastasized into a full-blown emotion. Lawrence didn’t mind the pain, in the literal sense of the word: he didn’t allow his mind to experience, and amplify, what his body had.
Stoic Camp is not merely a philosophy salon set in the Wyoming woods. It is a laboratory. We campers are the guinea pigs. A number of experiments are under way. Like this one: Take a middle-aged man, accustomed to certain creature comforts—including but not limited to pillows, blankets, single malt—and immerse him in a rustic cabin with fifteen malodorous grad students. Withhold bedding and single malt. Add continuous noise; season with bright fluorescent lights. Stir frequently. Freeze overnight.
It is in my nature to whine. It is in my name, too. I want to moan and groan and carp and kvetch and bellyache. I restrain myself, recalling an old Stoic maxim: “No good man laments, nor sighs, nor groans.” Complaining, Marcus reminds me, won’t lessen the pain and may exacerbate it. “Either way,” he says, “it is best not to complain.”
I look for a suggestion box—a suggestion, I decide, is technically not a complaint—but there is none. Of course. This is Stoic Camp. So I stop. I pause. Not a Mighty Pause, more a micro-pause, but I’ll take it. I slow down and ask: What aspects of this situation are up to me? Not the lack of heat or blankets. These are beyond my control. If I want a single malt, I could walk three miles into town. It’s my choice. The Scotch, as well as heat and blankets, are indifferents, even if they are ones I prefer. They are not under my control. Only my attitude, my assent or lack thereof, is. Epictetus uses the analogy of a dog tied to a cart. The cart is moving, and will continue to move no matter what. The dog has a choice: be dragged on the ground or trot alongside it. I need to start trotting.
Besides, I am engaging in what the Stoics call Voluntary Deprivation. (All right, not so voluntary in my case.) Seneca, among the wealthiest of Romans, recommended practicing poverty for a few days each month. Eat the “scantiest and cheapest fare” and wear “coarse and rough dress,” he advised. When Stoics practice Voluntary Deprivation they are, on one level, adhering to their maxim: “live in accord with nature.” Sweat when it’s hot, shiver when it’s cold, feel hunger pangs when famished. The goal of Voluntary Deprivation, though, is not pain but pleasure. By occasionally denying ourselves certain comforts, we appreciate them more, and lessen their hold on us.
Voluntary Deprivation teaches self-control, which has all sorts of benefits. Refrain from eating that piece of chocolate cake and you will feel good about yourself. Forgoing pleasure is one of life’s greatest pleasures.
Voluntary Deprivation cultivates courage. It also inoculates us against future deprivation, which might not be voluntary. We experience a prick of pain now but much less later.
I realize I’ve been practicing a version of Voluntary Deprivation for years, though I’ve called it by another, cheerier, name: Intermittent Luxury. The habit began when I was a foreign correspondent for NPR. I made several reporting trips to Iraq during the reign of Saddam Hussein. Due to UN sanctions, flights were banned. That meant a long overland journey from Amman, Jordan, to Baghdad.
I had a routine. I’d spend a few days in Amman, applying for an Iraqi visa and stocking up on provisions (chocolate, chemical suits, single malt). The Jordanian hotel was nice. Not the world’s best but nice. Good enough, as Epicurus would say. Once credentialed and supplied, I’d hire a driver for the twelve-hour journey across the Badia desert. My hotel in Baghdad, a creepy place called the Al-Rashid, was less nice. The rooms smelled of mildew and I suspect were bugged by Saddam’s agents.
When I returned to Amman several weeks later, the “nice enough” hotel felt like a palace. The bed was plusher, the food tastier—even the water pressure felt stronger. The hotel hadn’t changed. I had.
Years later, while living in Miami, I’d periodically switch off my car’s air conditioner, even during summer. Within seconds, the interior grew hot, my sweaty skin sticking to the leather seats of my VW. Yet I enjoyed it, for I had reminded myself what hot feels like and thus renewed my deep and abiding gratitude for Willis Carrier, inventor of the modern air conditioner. Voluntary Deprivation? I suppose, but I prefer to think of it as Intermittent Luxury—the unexpected upgrade to first class, the splurge at that restaurant everyone’s talking about, the hot shower after a weeklong camping trip.
So I decide to stop whining (internal whining is still whining) about the rough conditions. What had I expected from a place that contained the words “Stoic” and “Camp,” and in such proximity? Know what you’re getting into, Epictetus advised. If you’re going to the public bath, remember “there are people who splash, people who jostle, people who are insulting, people who steal.” Don’t be surprised if you get wet, or robbed. He’s right. Why should I be surprised that the accommodations at Stoic Camp are on par with a Baghdad hotel? It is not the lodging that must change but my attitude. Besides, the Stoics remind me, it can always get worse.
This brings us to another vaccine in the Stoic dispensary: premeditatio malorum, or “premeditation of adversity.” Anticipate the arrows of Fortune, says Seneca. Imagine the worst scenarios and “rehearse them in your mind: exile, torture, war, shipwreck.”
Imagining adversity is not the same as worrying about it, the Stoics say. Worrying is vague, inchoate. Premeditated adversity is specific—the more specific the better. Not “I imagine suffering a financial setback,” but “I imagine losing my house, car, my entire bag collection and am forced to move back in with my mother.” Oh, suggests Epictetus, helpfully, also imagine you’ve lost the ability to speak, hear, walk, breathe, and swallow.
By imagining the worst-case scenario we rob future hardships of their bite, and appreciate what we have. When catastrophe strikes, as it inevitably will, the Stoic is no more surprised than when a fig tree produces figs or a helmsman encounters a headwind, says Epictetus. Adversity anticipated is adversity diminished. Fears articulated are fears lessened. That, at least, is the theory.
My daughter isn’t so sure. When I tell her about the Stoic notion of premeditated adversity, she declares it “stupid,” possibly even stupider than Nietzsche’s Eternal Recurrence. Not only is contemplating adversity depressing, she says, but it’s unnecessary. “You already worry about bad stuff happening anyway. Why would you force yourself to do it more?” She has a point. Then again, she’s only thirteen years old, not exactly the target demographic of Stoicism, the philosophy of hard knocks. Give her time, I tell myself.
By the third day of Stoic Camp, we fall into a routine. We devote mornings to Epictetus and his Handbook. In the afternoons, we break into smaller groups and discuss Marcus Aurelius. The grad students struggle with the philosopher-emperor. He’s too squishy. There’s nothing to grab on to, nothing to dissect. Marcus isn’t trying to prove or disprove anything. He is not postulating. He is a man wrestling out loud with endemic self-doubt, working out what it means to be a human being.