Бесплатная библиотека
Читайте книгу на сайте или телефоне
READ-E-BOOK » История » Towards the Spiritual Convergence of America and Russia: American Mind and Russian Soul, American Individuality and Russian Community, and the Potent Alchemy of National Characteristics
Towards the Spiritual Convergence of America and Russia: American Mind and Russian Soul, American Individuality and Russian Community, and the Potent Alchemy of National Characteristics - Читать Любимую Русскую Полную Книгу 👉 Read-E-Book.com

Towards the Spiritual Convergence of America and Russia: American Mind and Russian Soul, American Individuality and Russian Community, and the Potent Alchemy of National Characteristics

Электронная книга - «Towards the Spiritual Convergence of America and Russia: American Mind and Russian Soul, American Individuality and Russian Community, and the Potent Alchemy of National Characteristics». Краткое содержание книги:

In his book Towards the Spiritual Convergence of America and Russia an independent American scholar Stephen Lapeyrouse explores spiritual connections between two countries on the example of such kindred philosophical movements as American Transcendentalism (R. W. Emerson, H. D. Thoreau) and Russian Slavophilism (I. Kireyevsky, A. Khomyakov).
“If my efforts in this work are adequate to the task, I wish to make substantial intellectual contributions towards a clear description of how essential and profound a spiritual, philosophical and psychological relation exists, between characteristic highest (“vertical”) conceptions and aspirations — and tasks — of Mankind in America and Russia. The hope is that such understanding could contribute, essentially, towards a clearer, creative, and mutually-beneficial spiritual orientation — in thoughtful and heartful individuals of both nationalities — which might lead to a more conscious spiritual meeting of “Russian” and “American”; and thereby, possibly, promote an alchemical blending of the American Mind and Russian Soul, American Individuality and Russian Community. Such a greater clarity towards a greater spiritual realization, and more complete wholeness, in some men and women of each country, and thereby, perhaps, in portions of Mankind as a whole.” — the Author
1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... 33
Перейти на страницу:

And what greater calamity can fall upon a nation that a loss of worship? Then all things go to decay. Genius leaves the temple to haunt the senate or the market. Literature becomes frivolous. Science is cold. The eye of youth is not lighted by other worlds, and age is without honor. Society lives to trifles… [149]

* * *

The essential, pivotal question is: What is Man? What is the true inner identity of Man? A “risen ape”; a “fallen angel”; a tabula rasa; a reincarnating spiritual entelechy caught amidst an inner war of good and evil? If there is no creative God, heaven or ‘afterlife’; if there are in fact no “wings to heaven”; no other continuance or existence for man beyond that of the temporary, singular life which inevitably ends in some oblivion of death; if all the mythologies, religions and cosmologies, which reveal a deeply woven spiritual-earthly multifabric to life, are unreal fantasy; then indeed some “horizontal”, earthly identity of Man — perhaps some Darwinian, of even Deist, conception — is more than less adequate as scientific knowledge. (Humanism, no matter how noble, is still defeated by death.) But it was a “vertical”, a spiritual dimension, which Emerson and the Slavophiles asserted. Indeed, to them all, this idea of the “vertical”-veridical dimension of life, was the central axis round which all the life of Man, inner and outer, individual and societal, personal and historical, earthly and spiritual, was to be understood and evaluated.

Those who reject such a “vertical” evaluation of life — then or now — will of course, in essence, need to reject such philosophers as these, as fantasts; от, as the word is sometimes used, “idealists”. Both America and Russia, and all of Mankind — past, present and future — have souls that reject such “otherworldly” speculation as false and illusory. But the message of all three, Emerson, Kireyevsky and Khomyakov, was an expression of Man’s ultimate spiritual identity, and a call to its fuller realization — in the individual, the society, in temporal and material-earthly existence. [150]

This call, and the world-view on which it is based for its substantiation and truth, is no less a question and challenge now, than when these three outstanding individuals themselves restated this deep perennial summons. If the “vertical” is fantasy, then this essay itself, is merely a fruitless, pitiful dalliance of mind — not to mention a fair amount of other material in the intellectual and spiritual history of Occidental Man — including of course, the thought, work and lives of Emerson, Kireyevsky and Khomyakov.

It is of great significance and meaning that Emerson uses the “old fable… that there is One Man”. For by doing so he brings the question of the identity of Man in America (and the American Scholar as “Man-Thinking” [151] in America) into direct association with the deepest spiritual traditions and heritage of Occidental Man, of which the Russians are also progeny. Emerson, also, embraces an idea of Man in America which is far older, grander and deeper than America itself. It is not the American Man which Emerson heralds; it is the American Man. So that, this “quintessential American”, this author of America’s “Intellectual and Spiritual Declarations of Independence”, solicits for his use and meaning, an idea of Man which far surpasses in time and heritage, any temporary, historical, lesser conceptions of “American”. [152] This is inherent in the two addresses of Emerson, from which citations above were made.

But we must understand more fully what Ralph Waldo Emerson meant when he thought of the inner constitution of this “One Man”.

The fundamental idea of Man which Emerson, and Kireyevsky and Khomyakov embraced — it also constitutes the core anthropology of Orthodox Christianity — was that Man was a potential God, a small god incarnate. Men and women of Mankind could participate in divinity; they could bring, as it has been described, “the spark of God”, within their selves, into bright realization. This is clearly and unambiguously expressed in the Orthodox Christian doctrine of deification, apotheosis. In Kireyevsky and Khomyakov, the idea of Man was basically influenced — if not principally determined — by this Orthodox anthropology. It is an idea which constitutes, essentially, the highest spiritual idea, and ideal, of Man in the history of the Occident It is the idea of Man “made in the image and likeness of God”. [153] This great idea, this tremendous ideal — which sources ultimately, in the historical record for Occidental Man, in the “wisdom of man” of Zarathustra [154] — constitutes the intellectual and spiritual core of Emerson’s summons to Man in America. The ideal of Man to Ralph Waldo Emerson was not based on the Deist anthropology of Jefferson [155]; it sources, ultimately, in what could be called the anthroposophy of Zarathustra. [156]

While the idea of divinity in man is, of course, not historically unique to Emerson; it was uncommon enough, in the America of Emerson’s time, to have brought about much controversy in the society around him, into which it was spoken. In Russia, on the contrary, in “Holy Russia”, the idea of deification, was central to the teachings of the Orthodox Church; so that for this reason, Kireyevsky and Khomyakov were able, essentially, to embrace — from their own perspectives — this religious tradition and its teachings. As is written in a current, popular (English-language) study of the Orthodox Church:

The aim of the Christian life which Seraphim [of Sarov [157]] described as the acquisition of the Holy Spirit of God, can equally well be defined in terms of deification. Basil described man as a creature who has received the order to become a god…Such according to the Orthodox Church, is the final goal at which every Christian must aim: to become god, to attain theosis , ‘deification’ or ‘divinization.’ For Orthodoxy man’s salvation and redemption mean his deification. [158]

Behind this doctrine of deification, there lies the idea of man “made according to the image and likeness of God”.

For Maximus the Confessor, for example, whom Kireyevsky helped to translate into Russian for the nineteenth century, this too was the ultimate goal of man: to regain the likeness of God (Khomyakov we shall consider in the coming section.)

For Emerson the situation was quite different. In the Protestant Calvinism, which pervaded, to various degrees, the doctrines of the various churches of New England — as well as the habituated customs and moral feelings, and the general social, cultural and intellectual world in which Emerson lived — the belief was less or more clearly and consciously present, that die Fall of Man (the “First Adam”) had irreparably damaged the “image of God” in Man. Individually and collectively — it was held — man could do little to repair this damaged divinity within. Hence, essentially, only through the past historical life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ — plus the grace of God — could men and women of Mankind be “saved”. Concerning Calvinism:

вернуться

[149] From the “Address to the Divinity Class”, Ralph Waldo Emerson: Essays and Journals, ed. Lewis Mumford, p. 61.

вернуться

[150] It could be said of Emerson, that his is a call for a striving towards a “verticality of the mind”, whereas Kireyevsky, Khomyakov, et al, present one which is rather a “verticality of the heart, or soul”.

вернуться

[151] While the etymology of “man” is still disputed by scholars, a serious theory derives it from the Indo-European root of sanskrit man-, to think; Greek, menos, mind, spirit; Latin mens, mind, mental; English mind. See Note 120.

вернуться

[152] See section “…and Spiritual Nationality.”

вернуться

[153] Cf. Genesis 1:26-31, 2:7-9.

вернуться

[154] The tremendous spiritual contributions and influences of this great, enigmatic, mythic figure, on the Old and New Testaments — and much else of the spiritual, philosophical, religious and intellectual history of not only Occidental man — are recognized, if debated, delimited and disputed, by serious scholars of Occidental Spiritual History. While much current interpretive opinion can refute, avoid, ignore, deny, calumny, etc., just about anything conceivable; the mystery and influence of Zarathustra, moves on through time, even into the current fascination with Siberian Shamanism, and the problem of atomic science.

вернуться

[155] It should be clear that the philosophical foundation of the American Revolution, with its Declaration of Independence, is based on a much more secular, “horizontal” understanding of man, nature and God, than Emerson’s “Spiritual Declaration of Independence”, with its “vertical” conception of the relation of Man to God. Emerson’s “United States Constitution” is ‘Self-Reliant’ Man. (Emerson spoke of the “moral constitution of man”. See Note 163) Hence, Emerson, here, is much closer to the Slavophiles than to Jefferson.

вернуться

[156] F. B. Sanborn, who was involved with the Concord School of Philosophy (cf. main text below) from its inception — he also edited a book of lectures, given at Concord: The Life and Genius of Goethe (1886) — wrote of Emerson, that he was “Persian rather than Greek, English or American. He was allied to the great Zorvester [Zoroaster-Zarathustra]… He was Oriental both in activity and repose.” Similarly Dr. William T. Harris, founder of the Journal of Speculative Philosophy, and co-founder of the Concord School, wrote of Emerson, that he “had done more than any other man to light up the past and the philosophy of the Orient beyond Judea.” See “The Concord School of Philosophy”, Austin Warren, The New England Quarterly, Vol. 2., 1929; p. 215. Cf. also Mansur Ekhtiar, Emerson and Persia, 1976.

вернуться

[157] “The first and greatest of the startsi [elders] of the 19th century was Saint Seraphim of Sarov (1759-1833)…”; quoted from Timothy Ware, The Orthodox Church, p. 130.

вернуться

[158] Cf. Timothy Ware, The Orthodox Church; Part 2, chapter 11: “God and Man”, (section 5: “Partakers of the Divine Nature”).

~ 21 ~ Предыдущая страница Следующая страница var width = window.innerWidth || document.documentElement.clientWidth || document.body.clientWidth; if (width > 768) { (function(w, d, n, s, t) { w[n] = w[n] || []; w[n].push(function() { Ya.Context.AdvManager.render({ blockId: "R-A-430869-4", renderTo: "yandex_rtb_R-A-430869-4", async: true }); }); t = d.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s = d.createElement("script"); s.type = "text/javascript"; s.src = "//an.yandex.ru/system/context.js"; s.async = true; t.parentNode.insertBefore(s, t); })(this, this.document, "yandexContextAsyncCallbacks"); } var width = window.innerWidth || document.documentElement.clientWidth || document.body.clientWidth; if (width
1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... 33
Перейти на страницу:
0
Сюжет
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0
Атмосфера
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0
Главный герой
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0
Общее впечатление
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Итоговая оценка: 0.0 из 10 (голосов: 0 / История оценок)