Бесплатная библиотека
Читайте книгу на сайте или телефоне
READ-E-BOOK » История » Nature's Evil [calibre 5.27.0]
Nature's Evil [calibre 5.27.0] - Читать Любимую Русскую Полную Книгу 👉 Read-E-Book.com

Nature's Evil [calibre 5.27.0]

Электронная книга - «Nature's Evil [calibre 5.27.0]». Краткое содержание книги:

Retelling the story of humankind through our relationship to the natural resources
1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ... 111
Перейти на страницу:

With a constant supply of cotton, English village workshops developed new techniques of dyeing cotton. The old colouring method that Alderman Cockayne had failed to master, even under royal patronage, relied on a supply of exotic and expensive dyes from the colonies and needed expert knowledge. In the mid-eighteenth century, craftsmen applied to cotton the new methods of print-making which had been developed by engravers and book printers for work on paper: wooden or brass plates were coated with dye and the cloth was rolled over the plates. Imitating Indian calico, printed fabrics increased profit; thanks to machines, their productivity was eighty times greater than that of traditional Indian techniques. Then chemists created a dye to replace the very costly cochineal. Proto-industry materialised the exchange between slave labour across the ocean, subsistence farming in the British countryside, and early capitalism in towns and ports. The source of raw materials, for example silk or cotton, was remote and concentrated; but their processing in Italy or England was based on the distribution of this commodity among dozens of adjacent villages and thousands of workers. New industries combined topical resources, such as sugar, cotton and silver, with diffused resources such as grain, wool, coal and hemp. But the extraction of topical resources and their primary processing – the cause of great evil – took place across the ocean, while the extraction of diffused resources and the secondary – most profitable – processing remained in England and Europe.

One of the most well-informed participants of the American Revolution, Alexander Hamilton, wrote that there was something in the nature of cotton that made it particularly suitable for being processed by machine. 32 Waterwheels powered wool, flax and silk factories, but the newest cotton factories were powered by steam engines. Those entrepreneurs who could take production away from cottages and put all the processing under one roof in a factory profited from the economy of scale, cutting transportation distances and using machines. In 1841 in Manchester there were already 128 cotton factories – ‘satanic mills’– and they produced more than half of all British textiles. The number of domestic workshops producing cotton and wool fell by a factor of ten. Having lost their work and land, people were moving to the factories.

The historian Karl Polanyi considered the Industrial Revolution to be a transformation ‘as extreme and radical as ever inflamed the minds of sectarians’. The new creed consisted in the belief that ‘all human problems could be resolved given an unlimited amount of material commodities.’ 33 New factories astonished contemporary observers by their size. More and more machines – for cleaning, spinning and, finally, weaving – were powered by the energy of falling water, harnessed by weirs and driven through mill-races. They all benefited from the economy of scale, but this scale depended on the nature of the resource being processed: in England in 1835 the average cotton factory employed 175 workers, while a wool factory had forty-four. Cotton mills were the first in which steam machines supplemented waterwheels; wool factories were several steps behind. The cotton thread, sturdier than wool, was not damaged by the tension and vibration produced by the machines; more expensive, cotton fabrics offset the expenses of complex machinery. Most of the inventors of the new machines started as watchmakers. Their machines were expensive and the cost of entering this new business was very high. But the expenditure was well worth it: large weaving looms, powered by waterwheels and supported by steam engines, could process the same quantity of cotton as hand looms but needed only a tenth of the workforce. 34

Richard Arkwright was the first entrepreneur to install a steam engine in a cotton mill; he used it to pump water to the mill-race of a waterwheel. He also invented a ‘water frame’ which continuously spun cotton threads and could be reconfigured; it was far more powerful than the hand-powered spinning jenny. Using new mechanisms, Lancashire businessmen produced grey cloth with linen warp and cotton weft, which could be printed almost like a calico. Robert Owen, a disciple of Jeremy Bentham, introduced this system in the Scottish village of New Lanark, which at the beginning of the nineteenth century became a centre for social experiments. Owen limited the working day in his cotton-spinning mill to ten hours, refused to employ children under twelve years old, and expected workers to know their multiplication tables. Robert Peel, the owner of watermills in Lancaster, soon adopted these rules; in 1819 these two mill-owners introduced to Parliament the Factories Bill, in an attempt to regulate the work of children in the cotton industry. Dogged by patent scandals and lawsuits, Arkwright still succeeded in becoming a wealthy man. Owen lost control of Lanark in 1825 but won fame for founding New Harmony, a utopian community in America. One of Peel’s sons, another Robert, became the prime minister of the United Kingdom.

The birth of the proletariat

With wool in decline, farmers and tenants lost their incomes, and shepherds turned into paupers. Again, the growing cities absorbed the surplus population. Much bigger than the metals-processing industry, the textile industry was the real cradle of the proletariat. Mechanised spinning and weaving looms needed constant input from human workers to keep them going. At the lowest levels, these people themselves had to work like machines, repeating thousands of identical movements and doing nothing else. The monotonous character of this work repelled the peasants, but their children excelled at this work. To a greater extent than ships or mines, these factories shaped an indistinguishable mass of human bodies who had nothing to lose but their work. These untrained but disciplined, poorly motivated and exhausted workers did constitute a proletariat of sorts – an alienated workforce subjected to the machine.

As long as cotton mills depended on waterwheels they had to be located near river weirs, which preserved the rural character of the industry. These mills were far from sea ports, usually in hilly terrain – they needed a fast-flowing current and stable river banks. Only the second generation of steam-powered machines, which didn’t need a waterwheel, made the cotton industry urban. Thanks to these new machines, coal-powered factories were built in the same coastal clusters which had been developed for long-distance trade. The Industrial Revolution led to the depopulation of interior regions. The widely scattered cottage industries that had absorbed displaced agricultural labour and the watermills that had been built where nature dictated were all abandoned. Proceeding at an extraordinary pace, new coastal urbanisation boosted inequality. Radically changing its terms, the exchange between town and country increased the power of the ports and metropolitan cities, which sucked in everything – people, resources and capital.

The Napoleonic wars caused a spike in the demand for fibre; it was needed in all its variety to meet the demands of war – ropes, sails, uniforms, blankets, tents and much more. After the war, demand plummeted and prices collapsed. Ships with American cotton stayed unloaded in British ports for months. Having returned to the hemp market in 1814, Russian landowners once again saw no profit. The pay of weavers in English factories was three times lower than during the war. In Lancashire, the centre of the textile industry, people were hungry. In August 1819 an infamous massacre took place at St Peter’s Field in Manchester. A mass rally of 10,000 textile workers and their families, dressed in their Sunday best, demanded bread, work and parliamentary reform. A regiment of mounted hussars with drawn swords dispersed the crowd, leaving fifteen men and women lying dead on the field. The incident was dubbed Peterloo, an ironic reference to the recent Battle of Waterloo.

1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ... 111
Перейти на страницу:
0
Сюжет
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0
Атмосфера
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0
Главный герой
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0
Общее впечатление
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Итоговая оценка: 0.0 из 10 (голосов: 0 / История оценок)