Бесплатная библиотека
Читайте книгу на сайте или телефоне
READ-E-BOOK » История » Nature's Evil [calibre 5.27.0]
Nature's Evil [calibre 5.27.0] - Читать Любимую Русскую Полную Книгу 👉 Read-E-Book.com

Nature's Evil [calibre 5.27.0]

Электронная книга - «Nature's Evil [calibre 5.27.0]». Краткое содержание книги:

Retelling the story of humankind through our relationship to the natural resources
1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 ... 111
Перейти на страницу:

The main buyers of Russian and Baltic linen and hemp were the English, who needed them for sails, ropes, fishing nets, underwear, tablecloths and cheap clothing. The Admiralty established the production of canvas and hemp in Scotland and Ireland, but the British fleet still depended on supplies from abroad. The prices for hemp and canvas constantly increased, especially during times of war, but the production of hemp and linen in England declined. It was a paradox of mercantilism that, while the British economy made its profits by processing American cotton, which was used largely for decorative purposes, the Royal Navy sourced its vitally important fibres from continental Europe and distant Russia – independent and frequently hostile countries.

Throughout two centuries, Russian hemp was more expensive than American. There was plenty of sunshine and water in Kentucky and Connecticut, where hemp was planted, but production there could not keep up with demand. It was a large-scale market failure. The invisible hand of the market worked for silk, wool and cotton, but with regard to hemp no commercial stimulus was enough. In his excellent book, Crosby asks why the American hemp growers didn’t use the Russian ‘secrets’, which everybody knew. 7 The explanation should be sought in the natural characteristics of hemp, the operations required for its processing, and the economic rules and political events which underwrote these operations. The mass production of linen and hemp developed on estates in Brittany, Silesia and parts of Russia, where serfdom had either been recently abolished or still existed. But the best hemp was made in those lands of northern Russia where serfdom was unknown. Serfdom does not explain the Russian success with hemp. My explanation comes from outside the realm of economics.

Today industrial hemp contains almost no narcotic resin; but this is the result of scientific breeding in the twentieth century. Before this every hemp plant contained narcotic substances. These properties of hemp, also known as cannabis, had been commented on since the time of Herodotus: the Scythians strewed hemp seeds over the scorching hot stones in the bath house, where they inhaled the fumes and conducted orgies. Historians and ethnographers have documented the use of hemp seeds by shamans, priests and pleasure-seekers. There is a theory that the ancient Israelites used these seeds for preparing anointing oil. Hashish – the crushed and pressed leaves and flower heads of the hemp plant, rich in narcotic resin – had its origins in China and the Middle East. But Europeans started smoking hashish only after Napoleon’s Egyptian campaign. Living among jungles of hemp, the farmers of the Russian and European North made use of the unusual properties of the seeds and resin of this plant. They used hemp seeds in cooking, ground them into flour, pressed them to extract oil. Medical manuals prescribed hemp seeds as a painkiller, a sedative, a diuretic and even a contraceptive. Anyone who had a field of hemp was susceptible to the temptation. And this is my hypothetical explanation for the stubborn resistance to hemp production in the Protestant and Puritan contexts: those who wanted to avoid temptation shunned hemp, sacrificing the profits.

The fact that hemp was a useful plant and yet had unusual psychoactive properties defined its later fate. Its production was repeatedly banned, either by royal decree or by Acts of Parliament. The US Congress considered any hemp plant, even scientifically bred, as a source of drugs and in 1937 introduced a prohibitive tax which undermined its production; the industry had to be urgently re-established during the war. For similar reasons, in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the Protestant farmers didn’t wish to cultivate a source of easy pleasure in their fields. As a result, the Protestant states had to buy processed hemp from other countries. It isn’t clear, however, why this logic didn’t prevent the Anglo-Saxons and the Dutch from cultivating hops and tobacco.

Hemp and the Oprichnina

While the Spanish and Portuguese empires were directing their ships to the South Atlantic and the Indian Ocean, England was preoccupied with the North. In the sixteenth century, the Venetian navigator Sebastian Cabot made his base in Bristol; from there he searched for a northern route to China. His interests chimed with the dreams of another trailblazer, the alchemist and astrologer John Dee. Having drawn up horoscopes for the royal houses of Europe and maps for the Muscovy Company, Dee was the first person to formulate the concept of the British Empire. Mixing legalese, mysticism and history, Dee asserted British rights to all northern lands, great and small, from Greenland to the possessions of the duke of Muscovy: according to Dee, this exclusive right of the English crown came down from King Arthur. In 1555 Dee and Cabot formed the Muscovy Company – the first joint stock corporation registered in England. Elizabeth I took an interest and commissioned Dee to work on a book, The Limits of the British Empire . 8

This was the era of travel without maps, the hasty colonisation of distant lands, and well-thought-out ‘alliances’ with neighbouring countries. In 1553 three English ships, watched by the boy king Edward VI, set off from Greenwich to seek a new route to China through the northern seas. The ships were locked in the ice of the White Sea; one of the captains, Richard Chancellor, was saved by the Pomors, a northern people who had long been under the rule of Moscow. Chancellor managed to reach Moscow, conducted successful talks with Ivan IV (the Terrible), and took back to England a present of furs. More importantly, the tsar granted him a monopoly on trade in the White Sea. A year later Chancellor set off back to Russia, taking presents from the new English queen, Mary Tudor, to Tsar Ivan. He drowned on this voyage, but the English equated his discovery of Russia with the Spanish discovery of America. Another heroic Englishman, Anthony Jenkinson, sailed across the White Sea four times and reached Persia this way. All the same, he didn’t succeed in finding a new route to India; having entered Khwarazm in present-day Uzbekistan, he realised that he was on the old Silk Road. But Ivan the Terrible granted the English the right to trade freely and without duties, wholesale and retail, on the White Sea and throughout Russia; from there they could trade with third parties such as Persia or India. Most important was the English monopoly on trade on the White Sea; other foreigners, for example the Dutch, were forbidden to land on its shores or islands. The English were granted other unusual privileges – e.g., they were not subject to the Russian courts, and if they committed a crime on Russian territory they had to answer only to the Muscovy Company in London. They were also presented with a house in Moscow (now a museum, the Old English Court, not far from the Kremlin). They were given the right to establish trading posts in the north. The most important trading post was at Kholmogory, and there the English started a factory, making rope from local hemp. Customs officials and local governors did not have the right to interfere in Muscovy Company business. 9

1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 ... 111
Перейти на страницу:
0
Сюжет
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0
Атмосфера
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0
Главный герой
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
0
Общее впечатление
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Итоговая оценка: 0.0 из 10 (голосов: 0 / История оценок)