![Евангелие от Иоанна. Исторический и богословский комментарий [litres] - Читать Любимую Русскую Полную Книгу 👉 Read-E-Book.com](/uploads/posts/books/3/4/4/8/1/evangelie-ot-ioanna-istoricheskij-i-bogoslovskij-kommentarij-litres-download.jpg)
Евангелие от Иоанна. Исторический и богословский комментарий [litres]
- Автор: Иларион Митрополит
- Год: 2018
- Язык: русский
- Год: Литагент
- ISBN: 978-5-906960-31-3
- Жанр: Прочая религиозная литература
Электронная книга - «Евангелие от Иоанна. Исторический и богословский комментарий [litres]». Краткое содержание книги:
Евангелие от Иоанна существенно отличается от трех синоптических – от Матфея, Марка и Луки. Это побуждает рассматривать Евангелие от Иоанна как самостоятельный источник сведений о жизни и учении Иисуса Христа, существенно дополняющий три других Евангелия.
Евангелие от Иоанна представляет собой по сути богословский трактат, в котором события из жизни Иисуса даны выборочно, но каждое событие помещается в контекст той или иной богословской концепции и наглядно иллюстрирует эту концепцию.
В книге постоянное внимание уделяется параллелям между рассказами Иоанна и повествованиями прочих Евангелистов.
В формате PDF A4 сохранен издательский макет.
Motyer S. The Fourth Gospel and the Salvation of Israeclass="underline" An Appeal for a New Start // Anti-Judaism and the Fourth Gospel. Papers of the Leuven Colloquium, 2000 / Ed. by R. Bieringer, D. Pollefeyt, F. Vandecasteele-Vanneuville. Assen, 2001. P. 92–110.
Motyer S. Your Father the Devil? A New Approach to John and ‘the Jews’. Colorado Springs, 1997.
Mowinckel S. He That Cometh. The Messiah Concept in the Old Testament and Later Judaism. Grand Rapids; Cambridge, 2005.
Moyise S. Jesus and Scripture. London, 2010.
Muller K. Moglichkeit und Vollzug judischer Kapitalgerichtsbarkeit im Prozess gegen Jesus von Nazaret // Der Prozess gegen Jesus. Historische Ruckfrage und theologische Deutung. Hrsg. Von K. Kertlege. Freiburg, 1988. S. 41–83.
Neville D. J. A Peacable Hope. Contesting Violent Eschatology in New Testament Narratives. Grand Rapids, 2013.
Neyrey J. H. Jacob’s Traditions and Interpretation of John 4:10–26 // Catholic Biblical Quarterly 41 (1979). P. 419–437.
Neyrey J. H. The Gospel ofJohn in Cultural and Rhetorical Perspective. Grand Rapids; Cambridge, 2009.
Nicol W. The Semeia in the Fourth Gospel. Tradition and Redaction. Leiden, 1972.
Nielsen K. Old Testament Imagery in John // New Readings in John / Ed. by J. Nissen and S. Pedersen. Literary and Theological Perspectives. Essays from the Scandinavian Conference on the Fourth Gospel (Arhus, 1997). London; New York, 1999. P. 66–82.
Novakovic L. Messiah, the Healer of the Sick. A Study of Jesus as the Son of David in the Gospel of Matthew. Tubingen, 2003.
O’Day G. The Gospel of John // New Interpreter’s Bible. Nashville, 1995. P. 491–865.
O’Loughlin T. A Woman’s Plight and the Western Fathers // Ciphers in the Sand. Interpretation of the Woman Taken in Adultery (John 7.53-8.11) / Ed. by L. J. Kreitzer and D. W. Rooke. Sheffield, 2000. P. 83–104.
OdebergH. The Fourth Gospel, Interpreted in Its Relation to Contemporaneous Religious Currents in Palestine and the Hellenistic-Oriental World. Uppsala, 1929.
Okure T. The Johannine Approach to Mission. A Contextual Study of John 4:1-42. Tubingen, 1988.
Omerzu H. Der Prozess des Paulus. Eine exegetische und rechtshistorische Untersuchung der Apostelgeschichte. Berlin, 2002.
Osborne G. R. The Resurrection Narratives. A Redactional Study. Grand Rapids, 1984.
Paddison A. Scripture: A Very Theological Proposal. London; New York, 2009.
Painter J. “The Light Shines in the Darkness…”. Creation, Incarnation and Resurrection in John // The Resurrection ofJesus in the Gospel ofJohn / Ed. by C. R. Koester and R. Bieringer. Tubingen, 2008. P. 21–46.
Paulus H. E. G. Philologisch-kritischer und historischer Kommentar uber das neue Testament. T. IV/I. Lubeck, 1804.
Perrin N. Jesus the Temple. London, 2010.
Plummer A. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel according to St. Luke. Edinburgh, 1922.
Puig i Tarrech A. Jesus. P. 180.
Purvis J. D. The Fourth Gospel and the Samaritans // Novum Testamentum 17 (1975). P. 161–198.
Reinhartz A. ‘Jews’ and Jews in the Fourth Gospel // Anti-Judaism and the Fourth Gospel. Papers ofthe Leuven Colloquium, 2000 / Ed. by R. Bieringer,
D. Pollefeyt, F. Vandecasteele-Vanneuville. Assen, 2001. P. 341–356.
Reinhartz A. The Word in the World. The Cosmological Tale in the Fourth Gospel. Atlanta, 1992.
ReisingerE. C. The Law and the Gospel. Phillipsburg, NJ, 1997.
Rensberger D. Anti-Judaism and the Gospel of John // Anti-Judaism and the Gospels. Ed. by W R. Farmer. Harrisburg, PA, 1999. P. 120–157.
Rico С. Jn 8:25 au risque de la philologie: l’histoire d’une expression greque // Revue biblique 112 (2005). P. 596–627.
Robinson J. A. T. The Priority ofJohn. London, 1985.
Robinson J. A. T. Twelve New Testament Studies. Naperville, 1962.
Rochais G. La formation du Prologue (Jn. 1.1-18) // Science et Esprit 37, 1985.
Roth D. T. Other Friends ofJesus // Jesus among Friends and Enemies. A Historical and Literary Introduction to Jesus in the Gospels / Ed. by C. Keith and L. W Hurtado. Grand Rapids, 2011. P. 127–148.
Samkutty V. J. The Samaritan Mission in Acts. London; New York, 2006.
Samuelsson G. Crucifixion in Antiquity. Tubingen, 2011.
Sanders E. P. Jesus and Judaism. Philadelphia, 1985.
Sanders J. A. The Hermeneutics of Translation // Removing the Anti-Judaism from the New Testament / Ed. by H. C. Kee and I. J. Borovsky. Philadelphia, 1998. P. 43–62.
Schafer H. Jesus in psychiatrischer Beleuchtung. Berlin, 1910.
Schnackenburg R. The Gospel according to St John. Vol. 1. Montreal, 1968; Vol. 2. New York, 1980; Vol. 3. New York, 1982.
Schneiders S. M. Touching the Risen Jesus: Mary Magdalene and Thomas the Twin in John 20 // The Resurrection ofJesus in the Gospel ofJohn / Ed. by
C. R. Koester and R. Bieringer. Tubingen, 2008. P. 153–176.
Schreiner T. R. The King in His Beauty. A Biblical Theology of the Old and New Testaments. Grand Rapids, 2013.
Schuchard B. G. Scripture within Scripture. The Interpretation of Form and Function in the Explicit Old Testament Citations in the Gospel of John. Atlanta, 1992.
Schurmann H. Ursprung und Gestalt. Erorterungen und Besinnungen zum Neuen Testament. Dusseldorf, 1970.
Scott J. M. On the Trial of a Good Story // Ciphers in the Sand. Interpretation of the Woman Taken in Adultery (John 7.53-8.11) / Ed. by L. J. Kreitzer and D. W. Rooke. Sheffield, 2000. P. 53–82.
Scott Kellum L. The Unity of the Farewell Discourse. The Literary Integrity of John 13.31–16.33. London; New York, 2004.
Scroggie G. A Guide to the Gospels. London, 1948.
Segovia F. F. The Farewell ofthe Word: AJohannine Call to Abide. Minneapolis, 1991.
Seim T. K. Roles of Women in the Gospel ofJohn // Aspects of the Johannine Literature. Papers Presented at a Conference of Scandinavian New Testament Exegetes at Uppsala, June 16–20, 1986 / Ed. by L. Hartman and B. Olsson. Uppsala, 1986.
Simoens Y. Evangile selon Jean. Paris, 2016.
Skinner C. W. John and Thomas: Gospels in Conflict? A Study in Johannine Characterization in Light of the Thomas Question. A Dissertation. Washington, 2008.
Stibbe M. W G. John’s Gospel. London; New York, 1994.
Swartley W. M. Covenant of Peace. The Missing Peace in New Testament Theology and Ethics. Grand Rapids; Cambridge, 2006.
Swete H. B. The Gospel according to St Mark. London, 1898.
Taylor V. The Person of Christ in New Testament Teaching. London; Melbourne; Toronto; New York, 1966.
Taylor W. M. Peter the Apostle. New York, 1876.
Templeton D. A. The New Testament as True Fiction. Literature, Literary Criticism, Aesthetics. London; New York, 1999.
Tenney M. C. The Old Testament and the Fourth Gospel // Bibliotheca sacra 120. 1963. P. 300–308.