The Dutch Shoe Mystery
- Автор: Куин (Квин) Эллери
- Серия: Ellery Queen #3
- Год: 1931
- Язык: английский
- Год: Frederick A. Stokes
- Жанр: Классические детективы
Электронная книга - «The Dutch Shoe Mystery». Краткое содержание книги:
Ellery spread the long roll of paper on the table. It was the blueprint which Superintendent Paradise had brought him in the Hospital. Cigarette drooping from his mouth, he studied the map again for a long time.
Occasionally he scribbled his cryptic notes on the margin of the diagram.
Something seemed to perplex him. He began an endless pacing about the room, smoking innumerable cigarettes. The map lay forgotten on the table. His forehead was damp, white-lined, corrugated.
Djuna stole in shyly. He presented a fearsome aspect. On his black curly hair he sported a glaringly crimson wig. A sandy van dyke beard hung from his chin. A ferocious black mustache trailed beneath his nose. To complete the hirsute decoration of his features, his eyebrows spurted heavy grey patches, not unlike those of the Inspector. Rouge reddened his cheeks; black pencil had rimmed his eyes until they resembled the legendary orbs of Svengali.
He stood hopefully by the table, attempting to catch Ellery’s eye.
Ellery stopped short, a look of utter amazement spreading over his face. The surprise vanished; his face assumed a grave, even apprehensive, expression.
In a slightly quavering voice he asked, “Who are you? How did you get in here?”
Djuna’s eyes popped. “Why — Mr. Ellery — it’s me!”
“What!” Ellery retreated a step. “Get out,” he whispered hoarsely. “You’re fooling me... Djuna — that’s not really you?”
“Sure it’s me!” cried Djuna in triumph. He whipped off the mustache and beard.
“I’ll be eternally switched!” murmured Ellery, and the laughter which had been lurking in his eyes sparkled clear. “Come here, imp!”
He sat down in the Inspector’s big armchair and drew the boy to him. “Djuna,” he said solemnly, “the case is quite solved. All but one thing.”
“Shucks.”
“I echo that delightful sentiment — shucks.” Ellery’s frown crept back. “I could put my hand on the criminal today — the one and only person who could have committed both murders. I have a perfect, an airtight case. But that one stubborn little point...” He was talking to himself more than to Djuna. “One little point. Peculiarly enough, it doesn’t affect the capture in the slightest, and yet I won’t know everything until I learn the answer to...” His voice trailed off startlingly as he sat up with half-closed eyes, pushing Djuna from him.
“By heaven,” he said quietly. “I’ve got it.”
He leaped from the chair and vanished within the bedroom. Djuna followed him quickly.
Ellery tore the telephone from the night-table and rapped a number into the instrument...
“Pete Harper!... Pete. Listen carefully... Don’t ask questions. Just listen.
“Pete, if you’ll do what I ask now I promise you a bigger story than the one you got the other day... You heard me! Pencil and paper ready? And for the love of your eternal soul, don’t breathe a word of this to any one. Any one, do you hear? It’s not for publication until I say so.
“Now, I want you to go down to the...”
Challenge
To the Reader
At this point in the story of THE DUTCH SHOE MYSTERY, according to a precedent I created in the first of my detective novels several years ago, I inject a Challenge to the Reader... maintaining with perfect sincerity that the reader is now in possession of all the pertinent facts essential to the correct solution of the Doorn and Janney murders...
By the exercise of strict logic and irrefutable deductions from given data, it should be simple for the reader to name at this point the murderer of Abigail Doorn and Dr. Francis Janney. I say simple advisedly. Actually it is not simple; the deductions are natural, but they require sharp and unflagging thought.
Remember that knowledge of the article which the author extracted from the cabinet in the Anteroom, and of the information which the author gave to Harper over the telephone in the preceding chapter is not necessary to the solution... although if you have correctly followed the logic you may deduce what the article was, and with less certainty, what the information was.
To avoid any charge of unfairness I submit the following refutation: that I myself deduced the answer before going to the cabinet and before telephoning Harper.