![Философский постгуманизм [litres] - Читать Любимую Русскую Полную Книгу 👉 Read-E-Book.com](/uploads/posts/books/5/8/4/5/8/filosofskij-postgumanizm-litres-download.jpg)
Философский постгуманизм [litres]
- Автор: Феррандо Франческа
- Год: 2022
- Язык: русский
- Год: Высшая школа экономики
- ISBN: 978-5-7598-2475-6
- Переводчик: Дмитрий Юрьевич Кралечкин
- Жанр: Общественные науки, социология
Электронная книга - «Философский постгуманизм [litres]». Краткое содержание книги:
Философский ландшафт, сформировавшийся в качестве реакции на кризис человека, включает несколько движений, в частности постгуманизм, трансгуманизм, антигуманизм и объектно-ориентированную онтологию. В этой книге объясняются сходства и различия данных направлений мысли, а также проводится подробное исследование ряда тем, которые подпадают под общую рубрику «постчеловек», таких как антропоцен, искусственный интеллект, биоэтика и деконструкция человека.
Особое внимание Франческа Феррандо уделяет философскому постгуманизму, который она определяет как философию медиации, изучающую смысл человека не в отрыве, а в связи с технологией и экологией. Таким образом намечается постчеловеческий сдвиг, отвечающий глобальному требованию социальных изменений, ответственной науки и сосуществования видов.
В формате a4.pdf сохранен издательский макет.
Haraway D. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. N.Y.: Routledge.
Haraway D. 1996a. Modest _ Witness @ Second _ Millennium. FemaleMan © _ Meets _Oncomouse™. N.Y.: Routledge.
Haraway D. 1996b. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective // Fox Keller E., Longino H.E. Feminism and Science. N.Y. et al.: Oxford University Press. P. 249–263.
Haraway D. 2003. The Companion Species. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
Haraway D. 2004. The Haraway Reader. N.Y. et al.: Routledge.
Haraway D. 2007. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Haraway D. 2015. Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin // Environmental Humanities. Vol. 6. P. 159–165. URL: http://environmentalhumanities.org/arch/vol6/6.7.pdf.
Harding S. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Harding S. 1993. Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is “Strong Objectivity”? // Alcoff L., Potter E. (eds). Feminist Epistemologies. N.Y.: Routledge. P. 49–82.
Harman G. 2015. Object Oriented Ontology // Hauskeller M., Carbonell C.D., Philbeck T.D. et al. (eds). The Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television. N.Y.: Palgrave MacMillan. P. 401–409.
Harris J. 2007. Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People. Princeton et al.: Princeton University Press.
Hassan I. 1977. Prometheus as Performer: Toward a Posthumanist Culture? // The Georgia Review. Vol. 31. No. 4. Winter. P. 830–850.
Hassan I. 1987. The Postmodern Turn: Essays in Postmodern Theory and Culture. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
Hassan M.I. 2012. Expanding Masculine Spaces: Planned Births and Sex Composition of Children in India // Raju S., Lahiri-Dutt K. (eds). Doing Gender, Doing Geography: Emerging Research in India. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis. P. 179–196.
Hauskeller M., Carbonell C.D., Philbeck T.D. et al. (eds). 2015. The Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television. N.Y.: Palgrave MacMillan.
Hawkins M. 1997. Social Darwinism in European and American Thought, 1860–1945: Nature as Model and Nature as Threat. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hayles N.K. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago et al.: The University of Chicago Press.
Hayles N.K. 2008. Wrestling with Transhumanism // Hansell G.R., Grassie W. (eds). 2011. Transhumanism and Its Critics. Philadelphia: Metanexus. P. 215–226.
Hazen R.M. 2005. Genesis: The Scientific Quest for Life’s Origin. Washington: Joseph Henry Press.
Heilbron J.L. 2005. The Oxford Guide to the History of Physics and Astronomy. N.Y. et al.: Oxford University Press.
Hill J.R. 2014. Incidence of Abnormal Offspring from Cloning and Other Assisted Reproductive Technologies // Annual Review of Animal Biosciences. Iss. 2. P. 307–321.
Hird M.J. 2012. Knowing Waste: Towards an Inhuman Epistemology // Social Epistemology. Vol. 26. No. 3/4. P. 453–469.
Hochachka P.W., Somero G.N. 2002. Biochemical Adaptation: Mechanism and Process in Physiological Evolution. N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
Hooks B. 1984. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Boston: South End Press.
Horney K. 1926. The Flight from Womanhood // International Journal of Psychoanalysis. Vol. 7. P. 324–329.
Hubbard R. 2006. Abortion and Disability: Who Should and Should Not Inhabit the World? // Davis L.J. (ed.). 2006. Disability Studies Reader. N.Y.: Routledge. P. 93–103.
Hubble E. 1929. A Relation Between Distance and Radial Velocity Among Extra-Galactic Nebulae // PNAS. Vol. 15. No. 3. P. 168–173.
Hughes J. 2004. Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.
Hughes J. 2009. On Democratic Transhumanism // IEET, Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies. June. URL: https://ieet.org/index.php/IEET2/more/hughes20090623.
Hughes J. 2010. Problems of Transhumanism: Atheism vs Naturalist Theologies // IEET, Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies. January. Retrieved in January 2019: http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/hughes20100114/.
Huxley J. 1957. Transhumanism // Huxley J. New Bottles for New Wine. L.: Chatto & Windus. P. 13–17.
Huxley T.H. 1880. The Coming of Age of the Origin of Species // Nature. Vol. 22. Iss. 549. P. 1–4.
Irigaray L. 1985 [1974]. Speculum, of the Other Woman. N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Istvan Z. 2014. Should a Transhumanist Run for US President? // The Huffington Post. Blog. October 8. URL: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/zoltan-istvan/should-a-transhumanist-be_b_5949688.html.
Jablonka E., Lamb M.J. 2005. Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
James W. 1896. Is Life Worth Living? Philadelphia: S. Burns Weston.
Janes L. 2000. Introduction to Part Two // Kirkup G., Janes L., Woodward K., Hovenden F. (eds). The Gendered Cyborg: A Reader. L. et al.: Routledge. P. 91–100.
Johnson D.G. 2010. Sorting Out the Question of Feminist Technology // Layne L.L., Vostral S.L., Boyer K. (eds). Feminist Technology. Urbana et al.: University of Illinois Press. P. 36–54.
Kaku M. 2005. Parallel Worlds: The Science of Alternative Universes and Our Future in the Cosmos. L.: Penguin.
Kalinowski F. 2013. Phantom Flesh: Extreme Performance Artist Stelarc Interviewed // The Quietus. 6 March. URL: http://thequietus.com/articles/11469-stelarc-interview.
Keck D. 1998. Angels and Angelology in the Middle Ages. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Keevak M. 2011. Becoming Yellow: A Short History of Racial Thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kember S. 2003. Cyberfeminism and Artificial Life. L.: Routledge.
Kete K. 2002. Animals and Ideology: The Politics of Animal Protection in Europe // Rothfels N. Representing Animals. Bloomington et al.: Indiana University Press. P. 19–34.
King P. 2001. Duns Scotus on Possibilities, Powers and the Possible // Buchheim T., Kneepkens C.H., Lorenz K. (eds). Potentialität und Possibilität. Modalaussagen in der Geschichte der Metaphysik. Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt: Frommann-Holzboog. P. 175–199.
Kirby V. 1997. Telling Flesh: The Substance of the Corporeal. N.Y.: Routledge.
Kirkup G., Janes L., Woodward K., Hovenden F. (eds). 2000. The Gendered Cyborg: A Reader. L. et al.: Routledge.
Kitano N. 2007. Animism, Rinri, Modernization: The Base of Japanese Robotics // ICRA’07: IEEE, International Conference on Robotics and Automation. April 10–14. Rome (Italy). URL: http://www.roboethics.org/icra2007/ contributions.html.
Klingensmith S.W. 1953. Child Animism: What the Child Means by “Alive” // Child Development. Vol. 24. No. 1. March. P. 51–61.
Knuuttila S. 1993. Modalities in Medieval Philosophy. L. et al.: Routledge.
Knuuttila S. 1996. Duns Scotus and the Foundations of Logical Modalities // Honnefelder L., Wood R., Dreyer M. (eds). John Duns Scotus: Metaphysics and Ethics. Leiden: E.J. Brill. P. 127–144.